The Accessibility For Ontarians With Disabilities Act

Mayo Moran’s Independent Review of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act received widespread positive critique from individuals across the country that highly valued her in-depth insight into this topic of necessity. Although Moran’s Review reinforces the AODA, her own recommendations and critiques are what essentially bring the topic of accessibility into focus. Through her review, it becomes clear that a cultural shift is necessary within Ontario that can guarantee â€Å"full accessibility†. By exploring my personal perspective of Moran’s report, along with some key features of the AODA, this review aims to shed light upon the necessities required to push forward the positive movement of accessibility functions within Ontario. Although the AODA has implemented (through the documentation of policies and procedures) various changes within Ontario in key aspects of the city such as, transportation, education, healthcare, employment, informat ion, technology, customer service, etc. the enforcement of these changes are lacking. Some issues responsible for this lack of enforcement, as Moran magnifies are: inadequate funding, lack of Government leadership, insufficient support from stakeholders and businesses (small or large), and the emphasis on an inconsistency of training in regards to accessibility education throughout the city. However, it is crucial to note that independent businesses and stakeholders have been responsive to the AODA directly by acknowledgingShow MoreRelatedAccessibility For Ontarians With Disabilities Act1100 Words   |  5 PagesAccessibility legislation in the project Implementation and the Bureau of Administration directed a venture to receive Accessibility Standards and actualize those principles. Amid this project these divisions endeavored to unify as a significant part of the openness function as could be allowed. Compressing the aftereffect of the venture take after Gauges embraced in the En terprise Technology Architecture Acquirement instruments and procedures for all IT buys were adjusted Particularly, OntariansRead MoreCanadian Human Rights Case Study735 Words   |  3 PagesHuman Rights Act, the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, Ontario Human Rights Code, just to name a few.    It is important to recognize the prohibited grounds of discrimination stated in legislation. Within the Canadian Human Rights Act, section 3(1) the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability and convictionRead MoreTraining And Work Learning Policies And Practices1251 Words   |  6 Pageselimination of the designated group policy (DGP) back in the 1990’s. The policy was originally put in place to support the training of women, aboriginals, ethnic minorities and persons with disabilities but was quickly eliminated despite the recent growth in promotion for skills training programs. The employment insurance act creates additional obstacles for these individuals due to the narrowing of EI eligibility conditions which increased its requirements to log more weeks of work to be eligible to receiveRead MoreWomen s And Disability Issues Within A Broad Socio Cultural And Geographic Context Essay891 Words   |  4 PagesVera Chouinard is a professor in the School of Geography Earth Sciences at McMaster University. She has written on a variety of topics intersecting women’s and disability issues within a broad socio-cultural and geographic context (McMaster University website. 2015). Her topics include a critical feminist view of disabled women and issues such as legal rights, housing, employment, mental illness, social assistance, and health care (Academia.edu. 2015). In 2010, she also co-edited a book on disabledRead MoreThe Heart Of Afric Royal Ontario Museum Controversy3686 Words   |  15 Pageshelp to create that rich and fulfilling experience. So if t he point of interacting with art as Soren explores, is to have a transformative experience, then certainly the Google Art Project is not able to provide this, however, this is an issue of accessibility, which I will speak to in my third response. Soren examines how an individual can grow and transform through participating with the arts. Essentially, the data that she gathered pointed towards the notion that one could work better with art andRead MoreImpact Of Engineering On Society And The Environment2247 Words   |  9 Pagesprovides wildlife habitats. As of January 1, 2015 Ontario Regulation 368/13 was filed to amend the new 2012 Building Code. The amended requirements state that accessibility should be enhanced in newly constructed buildings. Five accessibility standards are already in regulation under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. One of the amended requirements states that there should be an elevator or other barrier-free access provided between storeys in most buildings, which is providedRead MoreOrganizational Structure Of Boston Pizza International Inc6328 Words   |  26 Pagesthe meantime, the emphasis on serving incredible tasting food in a cordial domain has been the spotlight since the Boston Pizza is known for its full-service restaurant. Boston Pizza endeavors to adhere to the spirit of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, by providing training to employees to treat all customers fairly. An outlet in Hamilton located close to hospitals and health care facilities, embraces the community clientele, by appointing staff members experienced in serving

From The Depths By William Balfour Ker - 1139 Words

Anna Fogle, Northridge High School, 9th grade World History Intro to Capitalism Standard: 9.9) Describe the impact of technological inventions,conditions of labor, and the economic theories of capitalism, liberalism,socialism, and Marxism during the Industrial Revolution on the economies, societies, and politics of Europe. Common Core: CCRS-W9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Objective: Students will analyze an image titled â€Å"From the Depths† by William Balfour Ker by answering questions to help introduce capitalism. Students will be able to explain the basic differences between socialism and capitalism. Students will summarize readings from Karl Marx and Adam Smith by answering questions during a think, ink, pair, share activity. Level of Thinking: Understanding, Analyzing Orientation: Students will start the lesson by analyzing the picture titled â€Å"From the Depths† by William Balfour Ker, and they will answer the questions â€Å"What is the message of the image?†. After students have written down their answers, the teacher will pick names from the bucket of fate for their written answer and for answers to the following questions: â€Å"What do you see?† â€Å"What different groups are represented in this image?† â€Å"What do the people in the upper part of the image think about the people in the lower part?† â€Å"What do the people in the lower part of the image think about the people in the upper part?†. This helpShow MoreRelatedHow Successful Was Organized Labor in Improving the Position of Workers in the Period from 1875-1900? Analyze the Factors That Contributed to the Level of Success Achieved.2890 Words   |  12 Pagesknowledge of the time period, assess the validity of this statement: The gro wth of organized labor between 1875 and 1900 was not a radical threat to American society. ________________________________________ Document A Source: From the Depths, William Balfour Ker, 1906 ________________________________________ Document B Source: Terence V. Powderly, The Knights of Labor Champion Reform, 1887 We are breaking up old traditions. We are breaking up hereditary rights, and planting everywhere

Unknown Mixtures Lab Report Free Essays

-Unknown Mixtures Lab- Purpose: The aim of this experiment was to find out the two substances of the unknown mixture from salt, sugar, dirt, and baking soda by looking at its properties. Hypothesis: Find the unknown substance by testing it out by heating it, pouring water, vinegar, and observing it . Procedure: 1) Materials- * 100ml of water * Vinegar * Bunsen Burner * 2 beakers * 1 spatula 2) First, do steps (3-6)to find out the properties of salt, sugar, dirt, and baking powder. We will write a custom essay sample on Unknown Mixtures Lab Report or any similar topic only for you Order Now 3) Observe and record the appearances of the four known substances. ) Burn the known substances one by one to see what will happen. When it starts to burn take the beaker off of the burner. 5) Add water to all substances. Make sure to stir well (until the salt and sugar dissolve) to see how each substance reacts with water 6) Add vinegar to all substances. Make sure to stir well (until the salt and sugar dissolve) to see how each substance reacts with vinegar 7) Observe your unknown substance and write down how it looks 9) Add water to the unknown substance. Check to see if it turns to mud and that the white substance dissolves. 10) Heat up unknown substance until it starts to burn. Check and see if the substance starts to turn brown and smell good and dry up and crack. This is to see if the unknown substance is a combination of dirt and sugar. Safety Precautions- * Remember to wear closed shoes just in case someone drops something like glass and it lands on your foot. * Always wear goggles, and for girls tie their hair, when near a burner so it doesn’t burn your hair or get something in your eye. Be careful not to drop the beakers so that there will be no danger of accidently stepping on glass. Observations- The sugar turned brown and smelled good when heated, salt turned black and smelled like burnt rubber when heated, dirt turned to mud when water was added, and baking soda started to bubble when vinegar was added. DATA: TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSTANCES SUBSTANCE| Characteristics| Appearance | Sugar| Heat: sugar turns bro wn and smells goodWater: sugar dissolvesVinegar: sugar dissolves| White, shiny, looks similar to sugar. Salt| Heat: turns black, smells like burnt rubberWater: dissolvesVinegar: dissolves| White, looks like sugar except it isn’t shiny| Dirt| Heat: dries up and starts to crackWater: turns to mudVinegar: turns to mud| Brown, has bits of rock and dried grass in it| Baking Soda| Heat: Water: turns water whiteVinegar: starts to bubble | White, soft, kind of like flour| These are some of the characteristics and appearances of the four known substances after experimenting (heating, adding water, adding vinegar, observing) to find their properties. This will help when trying to figure out the two substances in the unknown mixture. TABLE 2: UNKNOWN SUBSTANCE Substance| Characteristics| Appearance| Result| Unknown| Water: the substance turned to mud and the white specks dissolvedHeat: while the dirt turned hard, the white substance started to turn brown and smell good | * pieces of rock and dried and grass * small white shiny specks mixed in | Dirt and Sugar| This is the data collected from observing the unknown substance. From looking at table 1 and then comparing the appearance of the known substances to the unknown substance the unknown substance is the most similar to the appearances and characteristics of dirt and sugar. DATA ANALYSIS: The data collected states all the characteristics and appearances of the four known substances. This helps when trying to find the two substances in the unknown mixture. To gather the data the substances were burned, added with water and vinegar, and observed. Then with the information of the known substances was compared with the characteristics of the unknown substances. The unknown substance had characteristics similar to dirt and sugar, and so the unknown substance was experimented to check if they were really dirt and mud by adding water to see if it turned to mud and heating the substance to see if it would turn brown and smell good. CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION/IMPROVEMENTS: The purpose of this experiment was to find out the two substances of the unknown mixture out of salt, sugar, dirt, and baking soda. For this experiment my hypothesis was correct. The purpose of this experiment was achieved by observing and finding out the characteristics of each substance. The sugar turned brown and smelled good when heated, salt turned black and smelled like burnt rubber when heated, dirt turned to mud when water was added, and baking soda started to bubble when vinegar was added. According to table 1 the data shows that the unknown substance had similar characteristics to both sugar and dirt. And so to find out if my hypothesis was correct or not experiments were carried out based on tests that were characteristics of either sugar or dirt. One experiment was heating the unknown substance to check if it would start drying up and bubbling brown. The other was adding water to test if it would turn into mud. Some mistakes that could be improved in the experiment next time is- making sure not to pour a lot of salt into the beaker when heating it, since there was a lot of salt when heating it the smell was more nastier and shocking. Also when heating the dirt not to let it burn for a long time because when washing it, it was hard to get some of the dirt off. How to cite Unknown Mixtures Lab Report, Papers